-advertisement-

Class action filed against Verizon over ETFs

Posted by Joe P on January 29, 2008

So apparently consumers can win in arbitration hearings. A potential $1 billion class action suit is set to move forward, thanks to a ruling by Eugene Farber, a senior arbitrator-mediator for the American Arbitration Association. The class, which at 70 million is the largest ever certified in arbitration, is disputing early termination fees they were assessed by the company. These fees are being deemed “illegal” by plaintiffs’ council, Scott Bursor. This I’m having trouble wrapping my head around.

No one likes ETFs. Why would they? If you want out of your cell service, you want out of your cell service. Problem is, you signed a contract, and in order to escape from that contract you need to pay a buy-out.

Now, over the years this has been a firm $175 buyout. However, in late 2006, Verizon changed its policy to prorate the fee, dropping it $5 a month until your contract is up. It’s at least a step in the right direction. If the class is suing for reparations — i.e., trying to get back the prorated amount — then yeah, I think this case has legs.

However, if they want all $175 back because they don’t feel they should have been charged any ETF, well, then I have one suggestion: Don’t sign a contract! Yeah, you wanted that fancy new phone, and you could only afford it with a contract. Fine. But you still signed it, knowing it was a two-year deal. And the carrier, in exchange for your pledge of loyalty, knocked $150 or so off your phone.

I’ve always though that was kind of an even exchange. Yeah, no on wants to be tied down for two years, but no one wants to pay $400 for a phone, either. So you compromise. But once you take that subsidy and sign that contract, you shouldn’t scoff when you try to terminate early and are told you must pay first. No, you shouldn’t be paying $175 when you have three months left on your contract. But as I said, if the class is seeking a prorated refund, then yeah, I’m on board

But if they’re saying that ETFs in general are illegal, well, I can tell you what happens if they win. Because at that point, there’s no incentive to keep your contract. You can come and go as you please, and everything becomes prepaid. Which translates to everything becoming more expensive.

(Prepaid certainly can be cheaper, but heavy talkers are usually better going with a contract rate plan.)

So, seeking proration of previously assessed ETFs, yes. Seeking full $175 refunds, hell no.

[RCR Wireless News]

Going Cellular Feed Subscribe to the Going Cellular RSS Feed
Share on Facebook | Add to De.licio.us | Digg This! | Technorati

Filed under : Verizon Wireless



Related Posts:

-ETF class action suits allowed to proceed
-Know your rights with early termination fees
-Class action against AT&T may move forward
-T-Mobile sued over text messaging
-Happy belated prorated ETF day, AT&T!

6 Comments ↓

#80 Lawsuit could force Verizon to pay up for "illegal ETFs" - Motorola Q - Hello Moto Q Forums on January 30th, 2008 at 6:52 pm

[...] So, seeking proration of previously assessed ETFs, yes. Seeking full $175 refunds, hell no. From Class action filed against Verizon over ETFs | Going Cellular I guess what it really boils down to is what is being defined as an illegal [...]

#81 joe on January 31st, 2008 at 2:44 am

Why does everyone feel the need to post their opinion whenever they have one. Is it that cathartic?

#94 Alonzo on February 6th, 2008 at 3:03 am

That’s just fine for people who cancel six months into the contract. But I’ve been with Verizon for four years. And now in the 48th month of the contract they want me to make a choice. If I cancel now I will be billed $175, but if I wait until the day after the contract is up, they’ll only charge me for the next month of service. A month of service, I won’t be using!

#127 Know your rights with early termination fees | Going Cellular on February 12th, 2008 at 8:45 am

[...] issue in the wireless industry over the past six months to a year.This is best exemplified by a class action suit against Verizon. Well, it turns out Consumers Union decided to call 12 AT&T reps to get some answers regarding [...]

#325 Craig on May 15th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

Well, we switched providers, thinking our 2-year plan had expired, but missed it by FOUR DAYS. Now, they want us to pay $709 for our three phones…

#779 C.E. on September 15th, 2008 at 5:57 pm

I came late into this discussion. I just got the lawsuit info in the mail today. I had to cancel my contract due to personal reasons a few years ago. I had three phones for myself and family members, so it cost $525 plus balances due. I understand about the contract, and buying out and the value of the phone I bought, etc etc. But one thing not considered here is that, at the time I had my phone, Verizon would renew your contract for 2 years even if all you did was change your billing plan. Now *that* is unfair.

Leave a Reply

(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)
 



Mobile Week in Review


Featured Providers

Advertising