-advertisement-

Government working to overhaul early termination fees

Posted by Joe P on May 21, 2008

Early Termination Fees. ETFs. The bane of the cell phone subscriber’s existence. No one wants to pay $175 or $200 to rid themselves of a service they don’t like, or can no longer use. But that’s the way it is in the cell phone industry. While some companies, like Verizon and AT&T, have announced pro-rated early termination fee initiatives, it’s still not a standard in the industry. That is, until the government stepped in. Reports are that they are working with cell carriers to work on a way to make these fees a bit more reasonable.


The reason for early termination fees is simple. When you go into a cell retailer, they’re filled with phones that cost a lot of money. There’s a huge markup somewhere along the line, and I’m not sure where, but it seems like the furniture business to me. Anyway, in order to make these phones more affordable for customers, carriers offer to subsidize a portion of the cost.

What does the carrier get in exchange for this subsidy? A commitment, usually two years in length, from the customer. They figure that the profits they make from this customer will far exceed the one-time subsidy they provide for the phone.

So it’s easy to understand why they implement early termination fees. You made a deal with them, and you broke the deal. Ergo, you must even things out, since you still have your cheap phone, and the company hasn’t received what it thought it was getting by selling it to you at a discount.

The problem before was that these fees remained static, whether you cancelled after 45 days or after 23 months. Surely, a carrier can’t claim the that the damages are the same for canceling after three months and canceling after 18. Hence, the pressure to implement prorated ETFs.

The deal here is that they’re trying to make this an industry standard, which I think is a good idea. No, you don’t want the government dipping their hands in with excessive regulation. But early termination fees are at the root of a number of law suits. The avoidance of these suits might be a good enough reason to force proration on carriers. The deal, still being negotiated, also includes a provision that would allow customers to exit a contract fee-free within 30 days of signing up, or within 10 days of receiving their first bill.

This is what I’d like to call smart regulation. The policy might be a bit restrictive for carriers, but it saves them from an onslaught of lawsuits, and it saves the customers the headache of paying $175 to cancel their service.

Going Cellular Feed Subscribe to the Going Cellular RSS Feed
Share on Facebook | Add to De.licio.us | Digg This! | Technorati

Filed under : Consumer Issues



Related Posts:

-Sprint finally jumps on prorated ETF bandwagon
-T-Mobile to prorate ETFs starting June 28
-FCC Chair chimes in on ETFs
-Early termination fee deal could be off
-Is America moving towards unlocked cell phones?

6 Comments ↓

#339 Early termination fee deal could be off | Going Cellular on May 23rd, 2008 at 7:31 am

[...] Thanks for visiting!Easy come, easy go. Sources familiar with the issue are now saying that the FCC-proposed early termination fee agreement with carriers might be in the dumps, though talks officially continue. Though, it might [...]

#403 Going Cellular » T-Mobile to prorate ETFs starting June 28 on June 24th, 2008 at 7:32 am

[...] carrier will commence the practice of prorating early termination fees. While the government is working on a universal solution, most major wireless carriers have taken matters into their own hands. That is, except Sprint, [...]

#409 Going Cellular » What everyone ought to know about sharing mobile content on June 26th, 2008 at 11:00 am

[...] for ways to recover it. In order to recoup lost revenue from handset subsidies, they institute early termination fees which make it burdensome for customers to opt out of their contracts. Further revenue is lost if [...]

#424 Going Cellular » Is America moving towards unlocked cell phones? on July 8th, 2008 at 7:28 am

[...] the government looking to take the reins on early termination fees, though, unlocking might not seem as attractive to major carriers as it would if they were allowed [...]

#563 Going Cellular » Debating the role of states in wireless regulation on August 13th, 2008 at 7:45 am

[...] wants to ban states from charging new taxes on cell phones for the next five years. They want to federalize early termination fees. In essence, they want to take power away from the states in order to create (carrier-friendly) [...]

#792 Going Cellular » Sprint finally jumps on prorated ETF bandwagon on October 23rd, 2008 at 1:25 pm

[...] you’ll remember back to earlier this year, the government was working on a national early termination fee plan. We haven’t heard much about it in recent months, probably because there’s all sorts of [...]

Leave a Reply

(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)
 



Mobile Week in Review


Featured Providers

Advertising